ERVGU
GUV
42. પણ ઢોર નબળાં હોય ત્યારે તે ડાળીઓ મૂકતો નહોતો; માટે નબળાં તે લાબાનનાં, ને જબરાં તે યાકૂબનાં થયાં.

IRVGU
42. પણ ટોળાંમાંના નબળા પશુ આવતાં ત્યારે તે તેઓની આગળ ડાળીઓ મૂકતો નહોતો. તેથી નબળા ઘેટાંબકરાં લાબાનનાં અને સશક્ત યાકૂબનાં થયાં.



KJV
42. But when the cattle were feeble, he put [them] not in: so the feebler were Laban’s, and the stronger Jacob’s.

AMP
42. But when the sheep and goats were feeble, he omitted putting the rods there; so the feebler animals were Laban's and the stronger Jacob's.

KJVP
42. But when the cattle H6629 were feeble H5848 , he put H7760 VQY3MS [ them ] not H3808 NADV in : so the feebler H5848 were H1961 W-VQQ3MS Laban H3837 \'s , and the stronger H7194 Jacob H3290 \'s .

YLT
42. and when the flock is feeble, he doth not set [them]; and the feeble ones have been Laban's, and the strong ones Jacob's.

ASV
42. but when the flock were feeble, he put them not in: so the feebler were Labans, and the stronger Jacobs.

WEB
42. but when the flock were feeble, he didn't put them in. So the feebler were Laban's, and the stronger Jacob's.

NASB
42. but with the weaker animals he would not put the rods there. So the feeble animals would go to Laban, but the sturdy ones to Jacob.

ESV
42. but for the feebler of the flock he would not lay them there. So the feebler would be Laban's, and the stronger Jacob's.

RV
42. but when the flock were feeble, he put them not in: so the feebler were Laban-s, and the stronger Jacob-s.

RSV
42. but for the feebler of the flock he did not lay them there; so the feebler were Laban's, and the stronger Jacob's.

NKJV
42. But when the flocks were feeble, he did not put [them] in; so the feebler were Laban's and the stronger Jacob's.

MKJV
42. But when the flocks were feeble, he did not put them in. And usually it came to be, the weak ones were Laban's and the stronger ones Jacob's.

AKJV
42. But when the cattle were feeble, he put them not in: so the feebler were Laban's, and the stronger Jacob's.

NRSV
42. but for the feebler of the flock he did not lay them there; so the feebler were Laban's, and the stronger Jacob's.

NIV
42. but if the animals were weak, he would not place them there. So the weak animals went to Laban and the strong ones to Jacob.

NIRV
42. But if the animals were weak, he wouldn't place the branches there. So the weak animals went to Laban. And the strong ones went to Jacob.

NLT
42. But he didn't do this with the weaker ones, so the weaker lambs belonged to Laban, and the stronger ones were Jacob's.

MSG
42. But he wouldn't set up the branches before the feebler animals. That way the feeble animals went to Laban and the sturdy ones to Jacob.

GNB
42. But he did not put the branches in front of the weak animals. Soon Laban had all the weak animals, and Jacob all the healthy ones.

NET
42. But if the animals were weaker, he did not set the branches there. So the weaker animals ended up belonging to Laban and the stronger animals to Jacob.

ERVEN
42. But when the weaker animals mated, Jacob did not put the branches there. So the young animals born from the weak animals were Laban's. And the young animals born from the stronger animals were Jacob's.